HÅG Capisco 8020 vs 8106: A Detailed Comparison
PADDED PLASTIC
HÅG Capisco Puls 8020
Pro's:
- Modern, minimalist design with a sleek plastic backrest and seat.
- Lightweight and easy to move, ideal for dynamic work environments.
- Partially padded saddle seat, providing ergonomic benefits while being easier to clean and maintain.
- Affordable compared to the 8106, offering good value for active sit-stand users.
- Easy maintenance, perfect for shared or high-traffic workspaces.
Con's:
- Less cushioning, which may not be as comfortable for long periods of sitting.
- The plastic backrest offers less support compared to the fully upholstered models.
- Not as suitable for users who need extended comfort or spend most of their time sitting.
PADDED FOAM
HÅG Capisco 8106
Pro's:
- Fully padded seat and backrest, offering superior comfort for prolonged sitting.
- Better ergonomic support, especially for the upper back and shoulders with its larger backrest.
- Ideal for long hours of seated work, providing maximum comfort and cushioning.
- Premium look and feel, making it suitable for more professional office settings.
Con's:
- Higher price, reflecting its more premium materials and design.
The HÅG Capisco series is known for its unique saddle seat design and ergonomic versatility. Two of the most popular models in the series are the HÅG Capisco 8020 and the HÅG Capisco 8106. While both chairs offer exceptional comfort and support, they cater to slightly different preferences and needs. In this comparison, we will take a closer look at their key differences and help you determine which one is best suited for you.
1. Design and Aesthetics
HÅG Capisco 8020 is part of the Puls series, which offers a more minimalist design compared to the 8106. It features a saddle seat made of plastic with full padding on the top surface. This gives it a sleeker, modern appearance that fits well in contemporary workspaces, especially for those looking for a lighter, easier-to-maintain chair.
In contrast, the HÅG Capisco 8106 is a fully upholstered chair that offers a more traditional and premium look. Its saddle seat and backrest are covered in soft padding, providing a luxurious feel. The 8106 is more suitable for those who prefer a more cushioned, professional-looking chair that provides maximum comfort during long work sessions.
2. Seat and Backrest
The HÅG Capisco 8020 has a plastic backrest and saddle seat with padding on the seat’s top surface. While it offers the same ergonomic benefits as the 8106, it is designed for users who do not need the full cushioning but still want to enjoy the support of a saddle seat.
On the other hand, the HÅG Capisco 8106 comes with full padding on both the seat and the backrest, offering more comfort, especially for users who spend long hours sitting. The backrest on the 8106 is also larger, providing better upper back support, making it an excellent option for those with more sedentary jobs.
Seat Width Comparison: 8020 versus 8106
If you’re looking for a chair with a slightly narrower seat, the HÅG Capisco 8020 might be the ideal choice. Compared to the Capisco 8106 model, the seat on the Capisco 8020 is a bit narrower because the 8106 is fully covered with a thick foam cushion, adding to its width. This makes the 8020 especially comfortable for smaller individuals or women with a narrow pelvis, offering a more compact fit while still providing the ergonomic comfort typical of the HÅG Capisco range.
3. Comfort Level
If you prefer a lighter seat, the HÅG Capisco 8020 is ideal. Its partially padded saddle seat is great for active users who switch between sitting and standing frequently throughout the day. The plastic components make it easier to clean and maintain, which is a big plus for high-traffic or shared workspaces.
For maximum comfort, especially for prolonged sitting periods, the HÅG Capisco 8106 is the better choice. Its fully padded seat and backrest offer superior support and cushioning, making it perfect for users who sit for extended periods or have more static work routines.
4. Versatility and Use
Both the HÅG Capisco 8020 and 8106 are highly versatile and work well with sit-stand desks. Their saddle seat design encourages movement and allows for various seating positions, from traditional sitting to standing postures.
If comfort and support are your primary concerns, especially during long hours at your desk, the 8106 is the clear winner.
5. Price and Value
The HÅG Capisco 8020 is typically more affordable than the 8106 due to its minimalist design and fewer upholstery options. It’s a great value for users who prioritize versatility and ergonomics without the need for full cushioning.
The HÅG Capisco 8106, being a more premium model, is priced higher but offers superior comfort, making it a better long-term investment for those who spend long hours working and need more ergonomic support.
Conclusion: Which One Should You Choose?
Your choice between the HÅG Capisco 8020 and 8106 ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences.
- Choose the HÅG Capisco 8020 if you prefer a modern, minimalist design, need a lighter chair for active sitting, or work in a dynamic environment with frequent posture changes.
- Choose the HÅG Capisco 8106 if you prioritize comfort, work long hours seated, and want a fully padded seat and backrest for maximum support.
Both models offer exceptional ergonomic benefits and are designed to encourage movement and improve posture. Whether you choose the streamlined 8020 or the more cushioned 8106, you’ll be investing in a high-quality chair that promotes better health and productivity in the workplace.
Related articles: